American History X

Next film on the 100 movie bucket list is 1998’s American History X.

Written by David McKenna, directed by Tony Kaye and starring Ed Norton in a story of extremism, racism and the inevitability of their cycle of destruction. Norton is Derek a neo-nazi just released after 3 1/2 years in prison for the manslaughter of two young black men. He is released to find his brother, Danny (Edward Furlong), in trouble at school for writing a paper based on Mein Kampf. His teacher (Elliot Gould) is disgusted, but the Head, Professor Sweeney (Avery Brooks), still sees hope that Danny is not following his brother. Derek has been changed by prison, he has realised the stupidity of his beliefs and the lies behind them. But now his challenge is to free himself from his past and its influence on him and his family.

At its heart this is a story of redemption and growing up, but a version of the story with a hard edge. It is often visceral and doesn’t shy away from the reality of the extremism that forms its basis. It also highlights the hypocrisy of those behind those views. Embodied here by Stacey Keach’s Cameron.

But for its hard edge it’s also rather predictable and Derek’s redemption story a little too convenient and simple to be wholly believable. It also lacks subtlety at times with an over powering use of its soundtrack just to ensure you understand the emotion you should be feeling, alongside some “on the nose” dialogue. And it does come with a rather predictable ending.

Performances are solid, Norton is excellent and brings nuance to a difficult character. Leach and Gould bring what you expect and Guy Torry’s Lamont, who befriends Derek in prison, also provides solid support.

American History X is a hard edged redemption story. It is a disturbing watch at times but also a little predictable and overly convenient at others. However, It is lit up by an excellent central performance by Norton who brings subtlety that other areas of the film lacks. Maybe not a great but an interesting watch none the less.

Turning Red

Domee Shi directs the latest from Pixar, again oddly straight to streaming on Disney+.

Meilin (Rosalie Chang) is a 13 year old girl of chinese dececnt, growing up in Toronto, a good student, a small group of good friends. She is devoted to honouring her parents and ancestors, she helps at home and in the family business, a temple they that attracts visitors to learn about their heritage. Life is good, her biggest problem is how her and her friends will get to see their favourite band. That’s until one morning she awakes to find she has turned into fluffy Red Panda. However Mum (Sandra Oh), is not shocked and explains that this is a family “inheritance” passed down through the families women, but it can be contained. At first the Panda Is a “curse”, until her friends find out and love her cuddly Panda form, turning Mei and the Panda into school celebraties! But that comes with its own problems as she now has choices she’d never considered and into conflict with her Mum like never before.

Turning Red has all you expect from Pixar. It looks fantastic a lovely mix between western animation and Anime. And of coursen, as a Pixar film, wrapped into this beautiful animation and humour is a layered story of growing up and testing boundaries.

While this doesn’t quite rank at the top of Pixar’s work, it doesn’t stop it being a wonderful bit of storytelling. Ultimately Pixar do good and very good films and this sits at the good end of good!

The story engages adults and children alike not with grown up jokes for adults and silly gags for kids, instead it is the same story but a story with layers that appeals to the whole audience.

The voice cast is super as you’d expect and the story is engaging, funny and emotional in all the right proportions.

Turning Red may not be a Pixar classic but it looks fabulous, with a talented cast and engaging story about growing up, finding your way and relationships. You can always trust Pixar to deliver and deliver again they do.

The Batman

Matt Reeves is at the helm for this latest reincarnation of DC’s Batman. Robert Pattinson dons the dark suite as we discover him in a Gotham over run by crime, from petty robbery to organised gangs run by overlords who have criminals and corrupt public servants in their pay. The crimes take a new twist with the violent murder of the mayor. Heading the investigation Lt. Gordon (Jeffrey Wright) brings Batman to the crime scene, where they discover a clue left for him from a new menace to Gotham, The Riddler (Paul Dano). But this is only the beginning as Riddler starts to carry out a series of killings to expose the corruption at the heart of Gotham, which challenges Batman to face not only these crimes but demons from his own past.

So does this Batman bring anything new? I think it does. There is a lot to enjoy here. With a gorgeously dark gothic look and some refreshing grown up storytelling. It’s feels more like a noir detective thriller than superhero film and works really well.

While Pattinson doesn’t bring anything particular fresh to Bruce Wayne that’s Ok. Zoe Kravitz’s Catwoman is a good foil and holds her own and there is good support from Wright as well as Colin Farrel (under a lot of prosthetics), John Turturro and Andy Serkis.

Oddly the film that this reminded me of most was Dirty Harry. Not for its world weary protagonist, but actually for its villain. Andrew Robinson’s Killer in Dirty Harry was wonderfully disturbing and Paul Dano’s subtle unhinged menace brings something marvelously disturbing here, a fabulous bad guy performance.

It’s not perfect, it is much too long with a final third that feels very “and here’s another thing”. But that’s a small gripe on what, even for its run time, is an enthralling and engaging grown up comic book film.

This is a detective story at its heart with a brilliantly disturbing foe. Yes it’s too long, but its well told story remains absorbing and engaging. This is a refreshingly dark, brooding, grown up film and for reminding us that you can do that with a comic book franchise it should be congratulated.

Alien

Film number three on our 100 movies bucket list is Ridley Scott’s 1979 classic Alien. A film that spawned a series of sequels of varying quality and endless parodies.

The crew of the Nostromo are in hibernation as their ship pilots them back toward earth. However, when they wake they find the ship has re-directed them after picking up a signal from a nearby planet. Captain Dallas (Tom Skerritt) heads the team down to the surface to investigate. While exploring a ship they discover, Kane (John Hurt) finds a “cave” full of “eggs” which, when he gets too close to one, triggers the creature inside to attack him. On return to the ship, science officer Ash (Ian Holm) ignores Ripley’s (Signourney Weaver) command to quarintine the ground crew and instead brings them onboard to treat the injured Kane, but with them he also brings the Alien, which puts the entire crew at risk.

Alien in reaity is a B-Movie horror, wrapped inside a 1970’s sci-fi. It borrows hugely from Star Wars in the look of the Nostromo and from any number of B-Movies where the merciless monster hunts down its prey. But that’s not to say it doesn’t do it well, using the isolation of space and claustrophobia of the ship to good effect. You can imagine the impact on a cinema audience in 1979 who would not have seen anything like it.

For me though, Alien has not aged particuarly well, especially compared to some of its contempories. While the ships practical effects look great, some others are a little comical, as is some of the script. With it once or twice “jumping the shark”, which is unneccsary as the central premise is good enough. That alongside the Alien itself, shown only in flashes to maintain its mystery, which helps build the tension and keeps the audience on edge.

You can see why Alien maintains its cult status and is fondly remembered and would have been a huge thrill to audiences at the time. However fourty years later some of the story and effects do creak at the seams. But as a sci-fi horror it still stands up and shows that in space nobody can hear you scream!

The Duke

Director Roger Michell’s last film is based on the true story of the 1961 theft of Goya’s painting of the Duke of Wellington from the national gallery. Jim Broadbent plays Kempton Bunton a man struggling to hold down a job, but a social idealist wanting to do more for the good of the people. His latest focus is demanding that over 75’s get a free BBC TV licence. At his side is his long suffering wife Dorothy (Helen Mirren), loves her husband but is frustrated by his campaigning. When Kempton learns about the £140,000 spent on the Goya he is frustrated and decides enough is enough and takes his campaign to parliament. While there the Goya is stolen and next time we see it, it’s in Kempton’s spare bedroom! With the help of his son Jackie (Fionn Whitehead) he hides it and uses it to demand money to fund TV licenses for the elderly. But when the risk of getting caught gets too much Kempton returns the painting, gets arrested and stands trial.

While the story lends itself to a comic caper there is a little more to it than that. In the background is a sadness for Kempton and Dorothy as they struggle to come to terms with loss of their daughter.

While this does give it a little depth, ultimately it is pretty light fair, the kind of thing to watch with a biscuit and a cup of tea! Which isn’t necessarily a bad thing. That’s very true here, a nice film with an unlikely hero and unlikely story.

Jim Broadbent is perfect as Kempton, his effortless charm and impeccable comic timing carry you along. Helen Mirren provides the perfect foil for him to work off. The two leads are well supported by a solid cast, but it is Broadbent who really makes this work.

The Duke is a nice enjoyable film, a fascinating and crazy story, well played with plenty of humour, heart and charm. It is pretty light and fluffy, and that’s just fine. One of those films that you’ll find on TV on a Sunday afternoon in years to come and settle down and watch again.

Cyrano

Joe Wright directs this screen adaptation of Erica Schmidt’s musical version of the Cyrano de Begerac story. Cyrano (Peter Dinklage) is a soldier with an artistic heart, a poet and a wit, but is also self conscious of his diminutive stature. Roxanne (Hayley Bennett) is his secret love, a long time friend, smart, articulate and wanting to be wooed. One night she sees at the theatre Christian (Kelvin Harrison Jr.) a young soldier about to join Cyrano’s unit and she falls for him. But Christian lacks the poetic heart to woo her. Together Cyrano and Christian give each other what they lack, Cyrano gets his looks, Christian his voice. But as always the road to love is never easy, especially at a time of war, and is filled with jealousy and heartbreak.

There are certainly things to enjoy in this musical adaptation of the well known story, but sadly not everything worked for me as much as I wished it had.

On the plus side there are lots of beautifully judged performances and the three leads particularly bring lots of charm to the screen. Dinklage full of wit and charisma and Bennett brings effortless charm to Roxanne.

Visually it is gorgeous to look at from the packed theatre to the desolation of the battlefield. And the use of dance is inspired often bringing a real beauty to scenes.

Sadly not everything works as well. The musical numbers are a little hit and miss, and pacing felt a problem throughout.

That said the film finishes on a high with a beautifully moving final act from the battlefields to a heart wrenching moment between Cyrano and Roxanne.

But overall it was a little uneven, at its best it is beautiful, moving and funny. But it doesn’t sustain that throughout and ultimately falls a little flat overall.

I did want to enjoy Cyrano more than I did. There are moments to enjoy and the three leads are each enjoyable. At its best it is wonderful, but unfortunately it’s not at its best often enough.

The Deer Hunter

Next on our 100 Movies Bucket list is Michael Cimino’s 1978 Oscar winning epic.

Michael (Robert De Nero), Nick (Christopher Walken) and Steven (John Savage) are friends from a steel town in Pennsylvania who are called up to serve in Vietnam. We meet them on Steven’s wedding day as they prepare and celebrate his marriage two days before heading to Vietnam. While Steven spends time with his wife Angela (Rutanya Alfa) Michael and Nick along with Stan (John Cazale), John (George Dzundza) and Axel (Chuck Aspergen) head to the mountains to hunt deer. From here life will never be the same.

It is certainly an epic, coming in at just under 3 hours. While it is long it generally uses its time well to give the main characters real depth, establishing relationships with each other and those close, including the complicated relationship between Linda (Meryl Streep), Nick and Michael.

Its second act in Vietnam is the films best, potraying the horror of conflict and its physical and mental impact. It manages all this without feeling overly voyeuristic. However, Its final act didn’t fully work for me at times feeling melodramatic. Although at others it did show real sensitivity with the way it handles its difficult topic.

It certainly look a film of its time, shot with that grainy realism of 1970’s blue collar America so popular at the time and works perfectly here.

It’s not perfect, it is long and predictable, although that should be put in the context of films since that have trodden similar ground.

It is an epic and feels epic, but it isn’t so big it forgets to take time to build characters we get to know and care about and allow excellent performances throughout to breathe. And while the Vietnam war is at its heart it’s not really a war film or even one about Vietnam. It’s much more about how war changes people and how friends handle change.

I wasn’t sure I would enjoy The Deer Hunter and while it is long, it is also thoughtful and uses much of its time brilliantly to develop characters and tell an often touching story. A film that, in my opinion, deserves its reputation.

Dog

Directed by Channing Tatum and Reid Carolin also written by Carolin and starring Tatum, is Dog. Tatum is Briggs a former US Ranger looking to get back on rotation after serious injury. When he is brought back together with his former company to remember his friend Rodriguez recently killed in a car crash, he takes the chance to push his case with his former Sargent. When he receives a call to come to the barracks he thinks persistence has paid off. However, it’s not the opportunity he expects as he’s presented with the job of taking Rodriguez’s Ranger hero dog, Lulu, on a road trip along the Pacific coast highway to his funeral. Lulu is as battle hardened and damaged a soldier as Briggs as they set off on a road trip that will change them both.

Presented with a synopsis about a damaged soldier and a damaged veteran dog on a road trip, you will imagine a certain type of road trip redemption story. Well imagine no more because Dog is that film. That’s not particularly a critisicm, it is just exactly the story you get. The Dog is the canine realisation of Briggs, all the trauma that Lulu has encountered and Briggs learns about are the things he doesn’t see in himself, but of course learns.

For all of its predictably that doesn’t stop it having a fair bit of charm, plenty of humour and some, if sometimes rather heavy handed, explorations of trauma and mental health. But what really makes it work is the ever watchable Tatum. A film almost made for his easy charm and comedic delivery and he has the perfect foil in his dog companion.

This is very much a vehicle for Tatum, there are a couple of cameo roles to enjoy Jane Adams and Kevin Nash as an isolated couple who live in the woods and Ethan Suplee as Noah the owner of Lulu’s dog sibling, in particular.

Dog won’t change anybody’s world, it’s a predictable road trip with a destination that of course visits self discovery and redemption on the way. But it’s not without charm and if what you want is Channing Tatum doing what he does best, with a dog for company, then this will work a treat.

The Notebook

100 Movies Bucket list.

From 2004 is Nick Cassavetes’s adaptation of Nick Sparks’s The Notebook. James Garner’s Duke is a cheerful care home resident, who reads from his Notebook to help another resident, Ms. Calhoun, who is suffering from dementia. He tells the story of Noah (Ryan Gosling) a country boy who falls for Allie (Rachel McAdams) a wealthy girl holidaying with her parents in his small town of Seabrook. As the summer draws to a close Noah shares his dream of rebuilding the dilapidated plantation mansion for them. Allie’s parents have different ideas and when they leave Seabrook, Allie doesn’t get to say goodbye. As time passes life moves on Noah goes to war, Allie meets Lon (James Marsden) who she is to marry. But when Allie returns to Seabrook before her wedding old feelings are rekindled. All the while Duke hopes that this story of love and loss can help bring Ms. Calhoun back from the clutches of dementia.

Let’s get to it, this is an old fashioned love story engineered to rinse the emotion from its audience. You know exactly what is to come as it borrows heavily from films before it.

But as engineered and obvious as it is I’d be lying to say I didn’t enjoy it. It has a real sweetness and charm. In Gosling and McAdams are two hugely engaging leads. While this is early work from both it’s no surprise they develop the careers they do. With Goslings performance one that he leans on so brilliantly in La La Land. Alongside them there is great support, Garner and Rowlands in their supporting story and Joan Allen as Allie’s scheming mother.

And it would be wrong not to mention a wonderfully done final act in Duke’s and Ms.Calhouns story, which powerfully shows the devastating impact of dementia on those with the illness and those close to them.

The Notebook is a paint by numbers love story, there are no real surprises with the story signposted throughout. But that is not to say there isn’t lots to enjoy, it’s full of charm with two hugely engaging sets of leads. You know your emotions are been manipulated from start to finish, but you really don’t mind.

Death on the Nile

Kenneth Branagh returns as Director and wearer of fabulous moustaches in his second outting as Agatha Christie’s Hercule Poirot. Death on the Nile sees Poirot in Egypt and a guest at the wedding of Simon Doyle (Armie Hammer) and Linnet Ridgeway (Gal Gadot). However proceedings are upset when Doyle’s former fiancée Jacqueline De Bellefort (Emma Mackey) aggreived at been dumped for her former friend interrupts proceedings. In order to escape her stalking the Doyle’s hire the Karnak a paddle steamer, which takes them and their wedding guests, the usual Christie style group full of secrets and motive, and of course Poirot, on a journey along the Nile. As they head off on this trip there is a murder and Poirot is called into action and of course all onboard are under suspicion.

I did want to enjoy this more as I do like Branagh as Poirot. But this second outting sadly is less than the sum of its parts. A well assembled cast, an Agatha Christie story and a sumptuous set. But sadly it seems to lack much of the fun and energy that was there to enjoy in Murder on the Orient Express.

Firstly it’s slow from the very beginning as we get a lot of Nile before we get to the death. We also suffer from one of the challenges that come with large ensemble casts of characters, we barely get to know any of them. And even for those not familiar with the story, the mystery is pretty well sign posted and you spend quite a lot of the film wating for it to reach its destination.

There are things to enjoy, Emma Mackey steals most of the scenes she was in, Sophie Okonedo and Annette Benning are reliable and watchable as is Branagh again as Poirot. And the final act does zip along and has the pace and intrigue lacking from the rest of the film. And it is big and bright and the humour when it does appear raises a smile.

Unfortunately though Death on the Nile does fall flat lacking the fun and energy of its predecessor. It moves too slowly and is all surface with little depth to engage you. Which is a pity, because Branagh as Poirot is enjoyable, but he needs to investigate why this doesn’t quite work.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started